tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post477748417795586800..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: The Quadriga, Medieval Exegesis, and the Rising Need to Know Hebrew and GreekRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-43956941363497578352014-10-16T08:36:00.724-04:002014-10-16T08:36:00.724-04:00Aquinas was limited by the theological sources and...Aquinas was limited by the theological sources and ideas in place in his times. If you want a genuine exegesis of 1 Cor 3:15, <a href="http://triablogue.blogspot.com/p/ot-and-nt-bibliography.html" rel="nofollow">check a modern commentary</a>. I'm not publishing these things because I think we should slavishly follow Aquinas. I'm publishing them so that we can understand the history of the middle ages, for the further purpose of understanding the discussions that took place during and after the Reformation. <br /><br />So yes, I'm sure there are some Roman Catholic theologians who slavishly follow Aquinas in the literal sense. There are others who reject him totally. Why do you ask? John Bugayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17728044301053738095noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-10846540205095435932014-10-16T07:39:58.649-04:002014-10-16T07:39:58.649-04:00John is the exegisis of scripture that Roman Catho...John is the exegisis of scripture that Roman Catholic theologians use the literal one like Aquinas or is it more the spiritual sense? Do Roman Catholic theologians follow Aquinas in the literal sense? I was Reading Aquinas's text on Corinthians and he seems to suggest that Purgatory and venial/mortal sins are literally evident from the text. Vincenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17686738325565738419noreply@blogger.com