tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post3286609922584840284..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Catholic blindersRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-89500666191625884102012-04-13T13:42:51.257-04:002012-04-13T13:42:51.257-04:00"That means that the Church can explain autho..."That means that the Church can explain authoritatively that Jesus hadn’t meant that John would live to the Parousia"<br /><br />Of course, the Vatican has never bothered to infallibly interpret the passage, even though they've had plenty of time to do so. What good is an infallible interpreter if they don't actually interpret anything?Semper Reformandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14654695501552603164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-34114557447226274402012-04-13T13:17:26.446-04:002012-04-13T13:17:26.446-04:00Of course, if it was a modern Protestant church, t...<i>Of course, if it was a modern Protestant church, there would have been a dozen different interpretations leading to a dozen different new churches.</i><br /><br />This is an interesting statement in light of the "Nestorian" thread over at Green Baggins. One might as well say, "Of course, if it was an ancient "one true church" with precisely the correct "interpretation",there wouldn't have been a dozen different splinters in the fifth century Christological schisms." Not to mention lots of dead bodies. <br /><br />Oh ...<br /><br />Oops.John Bugayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17728044301053738095noreply@blogger.com