tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post269837451930578459..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: The Interpretation of Scripture: In Defense of the Historical-Critical MethodRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-60201354271695420552008-09-15T08:55:00.000-04:002008-09-15T08:55:00.000-04:00VANBEREAN SAID:“And his book is still worth readin...VANBEREAN SAID:<BR/><BR/>“And his book is still worth reading?”<BR/><BR/>It’s not a book that Protestants need to read for their own benefit. It’s useful in doing apologetics on Catholicism since it documents mainstream Catholic hermeneutics.<BR/><BR/>But there are better books on how to exegete the Bible.<BR/><BR/>“Seems Joe's noggin is on the fritz._Or is he a victim of Neuman's development theory?”<BR/><BR/>Catholicism has quietly adopted Protestant Bible criticism—and of a somewhat liberal variety at that.<BR/><BR/>“Care to comment on Frame's comment that 'the historical-grammatical method has no biblical warrant' in a following blog?”<BR/><BR/>I’d need to have the precise reference.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-48299971817588861922008-09-14T20:43:00.000-04:002008-09-14T20:43:00.000-04:00And his book is still worth reading?Seems Joe's no...And his book is still worth reading?<BR/>Seems Joe's noggin is on the fritz.<BR/>Or is he a victim of Neuman's development theory?<BR/>Care to comment on Frame's comment that 'the historical-grammatical method has no biblical warrant' in a following blog?<BR/><BR/>Thanks Again,<BR/>RonRon Van Brenkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15623171051016737306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-35306171331889934422008-09-14T11:00:00.000-04:002008-09-14T11:00:00.000-04:00Hi Ron,The source of the problem may be the diffic...Hi Ron,<BR/><BR/>The source of the problem may be the difficulty in offering a consistent exposition or interpretation of inconsistent tradition.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-36928717176292750192008-09-13T08:03:00.000-04:002008-09-13T08:03:00.000-04:00Thanks for that Steve,Again, thanks for the multit...Thanks for that Steve,<BR/><BR/>Again, thanks for the multitude of great stuff at Tribo. What a blessing!<BR/>Just one question-<BR/><BR/>I'm puzzled with Fitzmyer's endorsement and refutation of Dei Verbum- when he declares that, 'the text means what the HUMAN authors intended it to mean'. Is he denying what is said in Dei Verbum chapter 3,that "they, as true authors, consigned to writing everything and only those things which He wanted"? <BR/><BR/>RonRon Van Brenkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15623171051016737306noreply@blogger.com