tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post2548630220168828729..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Cult of MaryRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-67194695275612617572018-06-04T17:48:05.176-04:002018-06-04T17:48:05.176-04:00I don't doubt they saw something. If i remembe...I don't doubt they saw something. If i remember correctly the description of Fatima vision one of the children thought it was a demon. But one of the others said how could a demon be so beautiful? Most of what the apparition said was blasphemous. It was a demon.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06882636190759154653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-31770720893286698102018-06-04T15:26:06.908-04:002018-06-04T15:26:06.908-04:00"He told me that several of the seers in Medj..."He told me that several of the seers in Medjugorje continued to have visions of Mary. In fact, he was with one of the seers while he was experiencing such a vision, although no one else in the room saw her. Samples told me he asked the seer if Mary had ever spoken to him. The seer said she had, recommending a specific book which the seer was to read. When Samples looked up the title of the book, it was occultic."<br /><br />I think I'm missing a pronoun here. Why did Samples ask the seer if the Virgin Mary had ever spoken to him? Of course the seer would say that *all* of these visions and messages are the Virgin Mary speaking to him, right? Why did the seer emphasize the book recommendation? Or is the idea that most of the time she appears without speaking, and the book recommendation was one of the only times she actually spoke to him?Lydia McGrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00423567323116960820noreply@blogger.com