tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post1885822078027101789..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Zach Needs 'Moore' Clothes: The Tale of a Pro-Abortionist in His Birthday SuitRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-8370033034741718672008-11-10T20:32:00.000-05:002008-11-10T20:32:00.000-05:00ha, your paragraph after Moore's analogy of your h...ha, your paragraph after Moore's analogy of your house is hilarious, and just what I was thinking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-15539783648414047122008-11-09T20:11:00.000-05:002008-11-09T20:11:00.000-05:00Vytautus,As and you shall receive! :-)Vytautus,<BR/><BR/>As and you shall receive! :-)Errorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10615233201833238198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-86417777303494382372008-11-09T19:09:00.000-05:002008-11-09T19:09:00.000-05:00The sentence "GIANT HOLE WHERE REST OF ARGUMENT GO...The sentence "GIANT HOLE WHERE REST OF ARGUMENT GOES" should have had a larger font.Vytautashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10563655929016752682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-30973834797674196372008-11-09T08:46:00.000-05:002008-11-09T08:46:00.000-05:00Good good good......<B>Good good good......</B>goooooood girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08464853146888246329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-11751554957143917982008-11-09T07:52:00.000-05:002008-11-09T07:52:00.000-05:00James, Moore invoked theological argument, I didn'...James, Moore invoked theological argument, I didn't.<BR/><BR/>I can and have defended that notion.<BR/><BR/>But again, as this post makes clear, Moore said his argument works WITH THAT ASSUMPTION.<BR/><BR/>So why give myself more arguing to do than need be. I was so happy when I ran across Moore's argument because it meant I could argue against his particular pro-choice justification *without* what I have had to do in (almost) every single other abortion argument I have ever had.<BR/><BR/>Given your first paragraph, James, I assume you would agree with me that IF the "fertalized egg" IS "fully human," then it is just as "worthy of protection" as that "developed fetus" you mention, right?<BR/><BR/>So, you must be able to see how Moore has shot himself in the foot. Perhaps he'll listen to you over me (we have a history, see. He's trying to win just <I>one</I> of our debates).Errorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10615233201833238198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-27200344246487067582008-11-09T07:27:00.000-05:002008-11-09T07:27:00.000-05:00Personally, I tend to view the developed fetus as ...Personally, I tend to view the developed fetus as "fully human" and worthy of protection. No PBA, no late-term abortions. I don't see why we need to even resort to theological arguments for this: we can simply refer to the base clinical definitions of "not death" (heart rate, respiration, etc.) that are accepted by all.<BR/><BR/>However, Paul, can you defend the notion that a fertilized egg is "fully human"? If so, can you do it utilizing language understandable and acceptable to both the secularist and the believers?Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05387448864812957107noreply@blogger.com