tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post116864617483025711..comments2024-03-14T14:41:17.663-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Online Introduction to the NTRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1168818272157340672007-01-14T18:44:00.000-05:002007-01-14T18:44:00.000-05:00Frank Walton said:"Just curious, is Wallace dispen...Frank Walton said:<BR/>"Just curious, is Wallace dispensationalist?"<BR/><BR/>I assume so, but this would be a good question for Jonathan Moorehead.<BR/><BR/>I'm also not quite clear on what dispensationalism stands for nowadays.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1168808148871989272007-01-14T15:55:00.000-05:002007-01-14T15:55:00.000-05:00Just curious, is Wallace dispensationalist?Just curious, is Wallace dispensationalist?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1168734856442437842007-01-13T19:34:00.000-05:002007-01-13T19:34:00.000-05:00On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historian...On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate the Year of our Lord with "common" era. A Christian should be annoyed (well, even more than usual) about that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1168721319088641642007-01-13T15:48:00.000-05:002007-01-13T15:48:00.000-05:00On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historian...On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate "the Christian Era" with "the COmmon Era". If I were a Muslim, I'd be annoyed (well, even more annoyed than usual) about that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1168706840005215402007-01-13T11:47:00.000-05:002007-01-13T11:47:00.000-05:00I could do without Wallace's use of "BCE" and "CE....I could do without Wallace's use of "BCE" and "CE."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com