tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post115411933881166830..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Self-scepticismRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1154187063572193102006-07-29T11:31:00.000-04:002006-07-29T11:31:00.000-04:00DM: Also, I reject all of the other creation stori...<I>DM: Also, I reject all of the other creation stories because of the lack of evidence for them.</I><BR/><BR/>And just what type of evidence would it take to persuade you, Daniel? The problem is that your interpretive framework has by default ruled out all possibility of the supernatural. Because you are precommitted to naturalism, for whatever piece of evidence a Christian may present to you for God's existence, you will do one of two things: (a) You will attempt a naturalistic explanation/interpretation of the evidence offered, or (b) you will fall back on your religious faith in the scientific method that, although there may not be a naturalistic explanation today, one day science will figure it out.<BR/><BR/>There are no brute facts, my friend. This debate is not about evidence but about presuppositions.Craig Sowderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11624212251233585028noreply@blogger.com