tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post114563150402458267..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Can He Possibly Grow More Incohrent, Part TwoRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1145694446822666382006-04-22T04:27:00.000-04:002006-04-22T04:27:00.000-04:00Amen to what David Gadbois said. Length by itself...Amen to what David Gadbois said. Length by itself is not the issue. Some things require that many words to be said. But this IS a blog we are deciding to invest our time with. When the posts get routinely novella-length we start to think maybe this kind of investment of time would be better spent on that book over there on the shelf...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-1145655296347298552006-04-21T17:34:00.000-04:002006-04-21T17:34:00.000-04:00Gene and Steve,May I, as a fan of Triablogue, humb...Gene and Steve,<BR/><BR/>May I, as a fan of Triablogue, humbly request that you enlist Dr. Anderson once again to format this blog in such a way as to only display the first several paragraphs of the longer posts with the rest of the content under a "continue reading..." link.<BR/><BR/>Good posts, Gene. We thank you for them. However, when I cut and pasted these two posts into Microsoft Word it gave me these properties:<BR/><BR/>Pages: 93<BR/>Paragraphs: 199<BR/>Lines: 3,020<BR/>Words: 30,938<BR/>Characters: 146,618<BR/><BR/>Yikes! This is tough to scroll through. It makes the site not very ergonomic to navigate through.<BR/><BR/>Blessings.David Gadboishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18375984671877016361noreply@blogger.com