Tuesday, April 01, 2008

The Boethian solution

(Posted on behalf of Steve Hays.)

Thibodaux keeps dishing up the timelessness of God as a way to harmonize divine foreknowledge with human freedom. As I've pointed out on several occasions now, this is philosophically jejune, and one doesn't need to be a Calvinist to see that.

His "solution" has been around since the days of Boethius. And it doesn't relieve the tension.
2.2 The Boethian solution

This solution denies the first premise of the basic argument: (1) Yesterday God infallibly believed T. What is denied according to this solution is not that God believes infallibly, and not that God believes the content of proposition T, but that God believed T yesterday. This solution probably originated with the 6th century philosopher Boethius, who maintained that God is not in time and has no temporal properties, so God does not have beliefs at a time. It is therefore a mistake to say God had beliefs yesterday, or has beliefs today, or will have beliefs tomorrow. It is also a mistake to say God had a belief on a certain date, such as June 1, 2004. The way Boethius describes God's cognitive grasp of temporal reality, all temporal events are before the mind of God at once. To say “at once” or “simultaneously” is to use a temporal metaphor, but Boethius is clear that it does not make sense to think of the whole of temporal reality as being before God's mind in a single temporal present. It is an atemporal present, a single complete grasp of all events in the entire span of time.

Aquinas adopted the Boethian solution as one of his ways out of theological fatalism, using some of the same metaphors as Boethius. One of the metaphors is the circle analogy, in which the way a timeless God is present to each and every moment of time is compared to the way in which the center of a circle is present to each and every point on its circumference (SCG I, 66). In contemporary philosophy probably the most well-known defenders of the idea that God is timeless are Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann (1981), who apply it explicitly to the foreknowledge dilemma (1991).

Most objections to the timelessness solution to the dilemma of foreknowledge and freedom focus on the idea of timelessness itself, arguing either that it does not make sense or that it is incompatible with other properties of God that are religiously more compelling, such as personhood (e.g., Pike 1970, 121-129; Wolterstorff 1975; Swinburne 1977, 221). I have argued (Zagzebski 1991, chap. 2) that the timelessness move does not avoid the problem of theological fatalism since an argument structurally parallel to the basic argument can be formulated for timeless knowledge. If God is not in time, the key issue would not be the necessity of the past, but the necessity of the timeless realm. So the first three steps of the argument would be reformulated as follows:
(1t) God timelessly knows T.
(2t) If E is in the timeless realm, then it is now-necessary that E.
(3t) It is now-necessary that T.
Perhaps it is inappropriate to say that timeless events such as God's timeless knowing are now-necessary, yet we have no more reason to think we can do anything about God's timeless knowing than about God's past knowing. The timeless realm is as much out of our reach as the past. So the point of (3t) is that we cannot now do anything about the fact that God timelessly knows T. The rest of the steps in the timeless dilemma argument are parallel to the basic argument. Step (5t) says that if there is nothing we can do about a timeless state, there is nothing we can do about what such a state entails. It follows that we cannot do anything about the future.

In my judgment the Boethian solution does not solve the problem of theological fatalism by itself, but since the nature of the timeless realm is elusive, the intuition of the necessity of the timeless realm is probably weaker than the intuition of the necessity of the past. The necessity of the past has the advantage of being deeply imbedded in our ordinary intuitions about time; there are no ordinary intuitions about the realm of timelessness. Perhaps, then, the view that God is timeless puts the theological fatalist on the defensive.

3 comments:

  1. The only wow gold exception to wow gold this is if buy wow gold you are using buy wow gold the 'Protect cheap wow gold item' Prayer. cheap wow gold This Prayer wow power leveling (if activated wow power leveling near the power leveling time of death power leveling and you have wow gold enough Prayer buy wow gold points to make cheap wow gold it last until world of warcraft gold one more item.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this wow gold in part because wow gold of the creative buy wow gold issues that buy wow gold had to be resolved cheap wow gold earlier in cheap wow gold the project? wow power leveling Yeah. I wow power leveling think the power leveling first issue... I power leveling can't speak wow gold much about buy wow gold Blizzard North cheap wow gold because its before world of warcraft gold from the core group.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is wow gold where Blizzard's wow gold event really buy wow gold fell down – there buy wow gold were a few days cheap wow gold of craziness in cheap wow gold there, where wow power leveling it seemed the World wow power leveling of Warcraft really power leveling had changed, power leveling and then, wow gold like an old buy wow gold television show, cheap wow goldeverything went world of warcraft gold and that's a shame.

    ReplyDelete